Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chayanon Khamkan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:50, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chayanon Khamkan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Looks to fail WP:GNG and WP:SPORTBASIC based on my searches. A Thai search yielded nothing better than social media, forum posts and Wikipedia itself. Google News gave me 3 hits, all of which were trivial mentions in TrueID. See 1, 2 and 3. The best coverage is Himsanam but, when translated, the article is little more than a quote on him being happy that he scored a goal. The same website shares another quote from him in another post.

SPORTBASIC requires multiple published non-trivial secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent, and independent of the subject. which is not found above when all I can find is a few instances of the player talking about himself on a Thai football website, which may or may not even be WP:RS (I couldn't see any indication of editorial oversight). Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 11:20, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting post. I'll admit I didn't even look at any of the social media hits as it's usually safe to just assume that it won't be RS. Interesting that they'd write anything about someone playing in the 4th tier of Thailand, though! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 13:52, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPORTBASIC explicitly asks for multiple non-trivial sources Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:15, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.