Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chavez School of Magic
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Consensus was that there is ample coverage to meet notability requirements. (non-admin closure) RayTalk 17:00, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Chavez School of Magic[edit]
- Chavez School of Magic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I cannot find anything reliable on-line to attest to the notability of this school. All the sources used in the article are self-published Ohconfucius ping / poke 02:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, significant coverage in multiple reliable sources; clearly passes WP:GNG.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 16:48, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Meets WP:SIGCOV immediately on performing WP:BEFORE. If you click the 'News' and 'Books' link in the Find Sources template you will find them. Mkdwtalk 23:13, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.