Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chavez, Venezuela, and the New Latin America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Aleida Guevara. ✗plicit 14:17, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chavez, Venezuela, and the New Latin America

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK, the article was created without sources in 2007 and ever since the book appears to have failed to gain any notability at all. NoonIcarus (talk) 13:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. NoonIcarus (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. NoonIcarus (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. NoonIcarus (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NoonIcarus (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. NoonIcarus (talk) 14:11, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could be merged to an author article, as most coverage I can find of the book (admittedly hard, since all elements of the title are popular and related in general) talks about her, a doctor, it seems. Kingsif (talk) 12:13, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Aleida Guevara. I found one review, which isn't enough for WP:NBOOK; there might be more out there but since this is a such a brief stub that no one is working on, no harm in redirecting it to her article really. I've added a heading on her article for the book, which was mentioned in the lead but not the body of the article, so we won't lose any content with a redirect either. -- asilvering (talk) 14:58, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.