Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ChatEngine
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to PubNub. clpo13(talk) 22:55, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ChatEngine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability. Fails WP:ORGCRITE due to complete lack of acceptable sourcing. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 12:43, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:06, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 02:08, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Keep or Redirect to PubNub. Also, have added some more refs to make the article pass notability. Heena73 (talk) 15:08, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 03:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpgjhpjm 03:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 08:59, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- A redirect as a categorized
{{R to related topic}}
to the company article atPubNub
where subject is mentioned seems like a good solution. If subject should later meet the inclusion criteria Wikipedia:Notability (software) or the general notability guideline, I have no problem with resurrecting the article. Sam Sailor 18:54, 13 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.