Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte County Archives

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Charlotte County, New Brunswick. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 00:16, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte County Archives[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:ORG or WP:GNG. It has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 13:36, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:28, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selective Merge to Charlotte County, New Brunswick, which presently has no mention of the archives. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:26, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I certainly wouldn't object to such a merge. Boleyn (talk) 10:33, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A municipal (city, town or county) archive is by all means a thing that can be mentioned in the main article on the city, town or county itself — but with the potential exception of a few very large cities, is rarely a topic that needs or can be reliably sourced enough to support its own standalone article. Redirect to the county per NorthAmerica1000. Bearcat (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment -- In UK most record offices have an article. Though Canadian history is shorter, I do not see why something similar should not apply there. At worst, the core of this article should be merged to the county article. The article has little real content, so that there should be little difficulty in adding a short archives section to the county article. Oppose plain redirect. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:19, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Yash! ^(Y) 21:16, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.