Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Owen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Owen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perennial candidate fails WP:NPOL. KidAd • SPEAK 05:44, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:47, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, coverage is largely WP:PASSING mentions. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:46, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Work as head of Kentucky Crime Commission may establish notability. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 19:12, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm guessing not, given that the commission isn't even notable enough for its own page. KidAd • SPEAK 20:35, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 09:49, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. As a candidate in several important Kentucky races there is likely to be state wide media coverage either offline or behind a paywall in Kentucky media on Owen which could potentially meet GNG. However, in my own searches I could not locate any RS with significant independent coverage. Without evidence beyond passing mentions, I can't in good conscience support keeping the article.4meter4 (talk) 15:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Per nom. Gentleman wiki (talk) 20:35, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.