Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie McDonnell
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. --jonny-mt 16:29, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Charlie McDonnell[edit]
- Charlie McDonnell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
An OR-full article, seemingly promoting the "artist". Possibly even non-notable. Jmlk17 22:52, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A few links for you:
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] Buc (talk) 14:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 21:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - multiple reliable sources exists so definitely notable. As for other issues, they aren't reasons for deletion, but are rather issues for article editting and improvement -- Whpq (talk) 16:22, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Clearly notable by virtue of sources that were already in the article when it was nominated. OR and promotion can be dealt with by editing. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:16, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - the references section was missing from the article so the inline references were not showing. I added the reference section after the nomination. -- Whpq (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.