Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Buhler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice towards recreation if she becomes more notable in the future. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charlie Buhler[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Before I deleted it as untrue this said she is a photographer, film director and actor. In fact she was/is a student. With so little to go on, we should delete and leave her on the Miss South Dakota USA page where most of the other title winners also have no page. The only reference is a "local person wins award" which is not notable. Legacypac (talk) 09:34, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The total lack of links sources still does not seem to even support the African-American claim.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:29, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I found some extra sources. Not sure if it passes notability though. --TheDomain (talk) 20:38, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 17:26, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Her first film is not due to be released for a year, so that does not give her anything yet. Directing one music video... I see a new director starting a career, so maybe later she deserves an article. A redirect would preserve the work to date in the history in case she hits the big time. Legacypac (talk) 18:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 13:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. It just seems like a case of her being put on here a little too soon. Lithorien (talk) 15:24, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.