Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charli Evans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. Single keep comment is not supported by facts. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 22:24, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Charli Evans[edit]

Charli Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:ENTERTAINER. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Sources in article are primary or WP:ROUTINE. Nikki311 21:20, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 21:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 21:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 21:21, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete No claim to notability. Article almost written like a promo (I just removed a claim to being "well known" for example). Side note; article was created by an account that has only edited this article and nothing else. The abundance of one IP in particular editing seems to smell of a sock but I'll leave it. Addicted4517 (talk) 22:53, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete – lacks in-depth coverage in multiple (or any) reliable secondary sources, and hence does not meet inclusion criteria. Citobun (talk) 14:23, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails WP:ENT.LM2000 (talk) 17:59, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete A wrestler who debutes 3 years ago. Doen't look notable: no major promotions, no major titles, no major feuds...--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.