Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles de Lannoy, 1st Prince of Sulmona.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. No case to answer. If you want to change the name, file a request at WP:RM. As the page is a redirect, you'd need to send it to WP:RFD if you wanted it deleting. (non-admin closure) SITH (talk) 16:17, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charles de Lannoy, 1st Prince of Sulmona. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · de Lannoy, 1st Prince of Sulmona. Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Error in article name. There's a dot in the article name.

Actually, it should be speedy deleted. I do not know where to request a speedy deletion. ––AiPee213-100 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - I have no idea what's going on here. Yeah, the sourcing of the article is bad but, assuming this IS the Charles de Lannoy who was a general for Charles V, sources can easily be found: 1 2 3 4 5. FOARP (talk) 13:45, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep. Nominator has not presented a policy-based cause for deletion. After the creation of this AFD, the article was moved to the proper title (without the extraneous period). Although unsourced in its current state, sources are trivially available – this doesn't fail WP:N. I suppose a claim can be made that the period-equipped redirect left from the move could be deleted as an implausible redirect, but WP:RFD is that way; this venue does not address redirects. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:25, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per FOARP. AD Talk 14:38, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.