Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Lokolingoy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 15:13, 16 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Lokolingoy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Has not played in a fully professional league. Simione001 (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, from the lead of A-League - "The A-League is a professional men's soccer league run by Football Federation Australia (FFA). At the top of the Australian league system, it is the country's primary competition for the sport.". Coolabahapple (talk) 01:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Response - That's true however the subject has not played a game in the A-League. Simione001 (talk) 02:03, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:TOOSOON. Fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG per this. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. — Yellow Dingo (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 07:08, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. This is the only article that I could find that might be deemed significant non-routine coverage. Fenix down (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment, so like Bai Antoniou, it may be a case of WP:TOOSOON? Coolabahapple (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:51, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:FOOTY or WP:GNG, has not played professionally, gsearch does not yield useable sources to bolster notability. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.