Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Hudon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 10:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Hudon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NHOCKEY. Not a first rounder in the recent draft. Contested PROD, removed under the mistake that the QMJHL counts towards criteria 3 (100 games played in minor professional league). The Q is a junior league, and doesn't count towards this criteria per long held consensus. Ravendrop 07:08, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails NHOCKEY. Can be re-created if he ever does. Patken4 (talk) 16:13, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:44, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY Article has WP:CBALL issues. He may be a professional hockey player in future and merit a wikipedia article but not at present. Its a bit too soon? Some prospects become professional players--as in football, basketball and hockey--but others don't make it due to ill health or issues beyond their control. --Artene50 (talk) 21:40, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep recipient of a notable award. Agathoclea (talk) 05:26, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Rookie of the year of the QMJHL is no longer a notable award per NHOCKEY. Ravendrop 05:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Then the RDS Cup article should be deleted, else it is a notable award independantly of NHOCKEY. Agathoclea (talk) 09:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
My argument isn't that the RDS Cup itself isn't notable; but that its winner isn't necessarily notable on that fact alone. There are a lot of awards both in hockey and in everything else that are like this. Ravendrop 09:51, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY (QMJHL Rookie of the Year isn't a notable award) and WP:GNG. Can be recreated if he becomes notable later in his career. Tthaas (talk) 15:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Can be recreated when/if he meets nhockey or otherwise achieves notability. -DJSasso (talk) 14:15, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.