Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Fee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:33, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Fee

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG, and has been sat in CAT:NN for 12 years. Boleyn (talk) 10:54, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:09, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:10, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is not enough 3rd party coverage of him. The award coverage is based from the award's own press release. THe one indepdent source is about a production and does not really indicate notability of him as an individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:03, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. A Google search for --> "Charles Fee" director <-- turns up 13,000 hits and a news search for the same search terms turns up 305 hits. I have not analyzed them. Are any of these shows equity shows, or even professional companies? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete (per Nom) and optional ATD "Merge" to (and expand) Great Lakes Theater#Artistic directors. A merge rationale is also supported by WP:BEFORE; "C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted" (#4): If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term. A general listing of Google search hits has been shown to not advance notability and "significant hits" directly supports merging. I am a fan of classical theater arts but when a search does not produce anything to allow for more than a two sentence pseudo biography, the questioning of notability is warranted concerning having a stand alone article. 12 years is long enough for something of substance to have emerged. The second paragraph is just a repeat of the first, to include duplicate links, but with the added years. This could be added to the first (and only) paragraph resulting in little more than a dictionary entry. Otr500 (talk) 07:13, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:MILL and WP:CREATIVE. As an artistic director of regional theater festivals, and winner of a non-notable award, he's not automatically notable. I don't see anything more than ordinary coverage. Bearian (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.