Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles E. Brannon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 08:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charles E. Brannon

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettler^{hello • contribs} 17:06, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:45, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon. Fails WP:SOLDIER (Ensign awarded one Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to USS Charles E. Brannon. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are no inline refs in the article, but we an probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon, the ship is notable, he is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:33, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon. The current single source is a bad link, but the article in that directory about the ship can be found here. I would say merge, however there's not enough to merge, a simple redirect will do. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:53, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon, fails GNG. Cavalryman (talk) 01:35, 2 February 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 05:41, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon, as fails GNG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Setreis (talk • contribs) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to USS Charles E. Brannon per above. I really don't see why this had to be relisted since the result was already #REDIRECT WP:SNOWing. Mangoe (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.