Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles Carreon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr 13 00:15, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Carreon[edit]

No third party sources showing notability, quick Google source does not reveal any as well Aboutmovies 23:11, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The case he was a lawyer in has a disputed tag on it, so this article seems a tad dubious. The lack of sources is also telling -- you'd think a case involving a website would turn up at least SOMEthing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 23:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article says he has publsihed a book, but neither amazon nor other online sources have heard of it. (There is a book on religion by anothjr author of the same name) There are a few online sources which seem to confirm that he was involvced in the sex.com legal case in some way, and that he is a practicing lawyer. But so are lots of people. No non-trivial indepenant refernces found in a google search for "Charles Carreon -Wikipedia". The current article reads like a resume. Not quite a speedy, although close to a spam speedy perhaps. still, let it go. DES ^(talk) 00:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Non-notable. Seicer (talk) (contribs) 03:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - hid legal work does not appear to be out of the ordinary, and none of the information ape pars to be verifiable. -- Whpq 20:58, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.