Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charis School (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 08:06, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Charis School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NSCHOOL. WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES states that "Secondary schools are not presumed to be notable simply because they exist." —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 07:38, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. A non-notable school. SBKSPP (talk) 03:26, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 02:27, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I couldn't find anything about it and the sources in the article are either primary or trivial blog posts. So unless someone can find WP:THREE references that it's possible I just missed then I'm strongly leaning toward delete. Especially since it's a private school. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:14, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zéro current news, no reliable sources. Citations just go to way back machine weak posts. Star7924 (talk) 14:56, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no non-trivial secondary coverage is to be found. Fails the GNG. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 03:56, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.