Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Channel BT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete - Yomangani ^talk 00:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Channel BT[edit]

Dicdef, already transwikied to Wiktionary (where it doesn't really belong either, but that's their problem). WP:NEO violation; I can't find any evidence that the term is used anywhere outside of the few Australian forums mentioned in the article. Aaron 21:42, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, the Google hits I looked at were all forum links; no reputable sourcing for this phrase. jd || talk || 21:47, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, as per above. Lunis Neko 17:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)#

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.