Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chandreshekar Sonwane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Daniel (talk) 20:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Chandreshekar Sonwane

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't pass WP:GNG; no other mentions in reputable sources, the subject generally appears to be a somewhat high achieving engineer, but there's no proof of established notability. There are no third party independent sources about them. The article was created by a new single-purpose account that have made no other edits in past two years. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. GreaterPonce665 ^(TALK) 21:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think that at least some of his many fellowships, as well as his membership in European Academy of Sciences and Arts, are enough for WP:PROF#C3. Searches may be helped by spelling his name correctly: Chandrashekhar, not Chandreshekar. I don't think his citation record is enough for WP:PROF#C1 but a single criterion is enough. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein. AFD discussions are far too prone to apply standards of celebrity journalism to people of genuine achievement and unremarkable personal lives. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. Fight for freedom, stand with Hong Kong! (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per explained by David Eppstein, passes WP:PROF. Akronowner (talk) 05:39, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked sock. MER-C 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep WP:NPROF is what needs to be looked at, not WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NACADEMIC as outlined in previous !votes, but a 2.5 year old misnamed BLP is beyond embarrassing and it needs to be moved as soon as the AfD is closed. - Astrophobe (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.