Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chance Phelps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep, meets WP:BIO. Majorly (hot!) 19:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chance Phelps

Delete Being killed in action does not make an individual notable.--Looper5920 17:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I originally put a notablity tag on the page and the nominator is correct, being killed in action does not make a person notable.--Joebengo 17:50, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 09:35, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per above. Simply non-notable. Ale_Jrb ^talk 11:15, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he meets WP:BIO, per [1]. Doesn't matter why he got non-trivial news coverage. --W.marsh 18:11, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep does seem to meet WP:BIO as per W.marsh. Davewild 21:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he in particular was the subject of major media attention he's notable. In this case, far more than the two mentions. There will be many more besides those in Google News. DGG 03:22, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this person meets qualifications in WP:BIO. He has recieved significant awards, is the subject of several media articles (including PBS), and two creative works. I'm also pending permission from another newspaper to reference thier articles. --Bahamut0013 16:16, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.