Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Championship Basketball Manager
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The "keep" arguments are not based on policy; the game must be notable. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Championship Basketball Manager (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable video game CTJF83Talk 04:41, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, It is a popular game in Chinese,so its influence is limited.--Ksyrie(Talkie talkie) 04:43, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While there isn't much of an assertion of notability in the article itself, the NBA does mention it on their basketball wiki here. However, this is a wiki, just like this one, so it's prone to mistakes and fails WP:V. JulieSpaulding (talk) 08:24, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 12:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No evidence or even assertion of notability. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 13:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep, this article was nominated for deletion within less than an hour of it being written! Don't knock down the house before it has been built. Flag it for improvement, and then prod/AfD it if editors cannot improve it over a more lengthy period of time. Taelus (talk) 14:57, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How is it, via reliable sources, notable, though? Whether or not the article currently needs expansion, which is purely an editorial issue, if notability cannot be shown now then we shouldn't keep it on the speculative basis that one day sources will turn up for it. Haipa Doragon (talk • contributions) 15:49, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.