Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Champion Management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nja247 19:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Champion Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Little outside sourcing is available online that doesn't appear to be from the company's own PR releases, or confused perceptions about them (see press release not even making the news wires). KingofPop.info is a blog; Snake Racing News item is a trivial mention; WordPress "article" is also a blog entry; Gemini "article" is a joint press release.
Also suggest a review of Ladd Biro, who is also authoring or editing this, his own article (indicating a severe COI), and KAOS Worldwide, though the KAOS article seems sufficiently supported. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 14:52, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Creator's comments: There is nothing inappropriate about either of these entries. They are not promotional in nature, but rather descriptive. Champion Management is a known, existing entity with a long list of celebrity clients. That makes it noteworthy. There are ample 3rd party references to this in the wiki.
- Ladd Biro is a nationally syndicated fantasy football columnist, as is heavily referenced in the wiki.
- These are legitimate entries and should be approved without further discussion —Preceding unsigned comment added by Laddbiro (talk • contribs) 16:03, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete - non-notable, blatantly unsourced; the shameless COI is no help, but of course not in and of itself a reason to delete. Notability is not contagious; having notable customers doesn't make you notable. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:57, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - for the reasons listed above. This type of self-promotion doesn't belong here.MKil (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2009 (UTC)MKil[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.