Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chalky (film)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was move to Wikipedia:Article incubator/Chalky (film), with the standard caveat that it can't sit there indefinitely. Seraphimblade Talk to me 11:50, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Chalky (film)[edit]
- Chalky (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Principal photography has not begun, so fails WP:NFF. The majority of the article content is available or appropriate if referenced in Michael_White_(producer). Lots of name dropping, clearly an attempt to support ongoing fundraising effort. Certainly a worthwhile project, but not encyclopedic. No editorial references supporting notability (yet). WP:TOOSOON -MJH (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I retract my erroneous comment about principal photography, which has commenced. Still according to WP:NFF without passing WP:GNG there should not be an article yet without substantial repeated editorial coverage.---MJH (talk) 19:51, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 20:04, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Incubate Per Too Soon/lack of significant coverage. CinephileMatt (talk) 18:51, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Incubate this currently-filming and as-yet-uncompleted film. Return to mainspace only if/when the film is complete AND has the requisite coverage. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.