Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chak 104 NB
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nominator withdrawal[1]. (non-administrative closure) -- RyRy (talk) 02:04, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Chak 104 NB[edit]
- Chak 104 NB (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unverified and not-notable. Article doesn't make any attempt to verify that this place actually exists. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 00:53, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand this article about a verifiable village in Pakistan. Pburka (talk) 00:59, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 03:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This village is fairly easy to find in Google and it is verifiably real.[2] • Gene93k (talk) 03:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, real places are inherently notable. JIP | Talk 05:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, all geographical locations are notable. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 14:34, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep obviously, having already declined a speedy request and a prod on this. Long-standing convention is that named towns are always notable. Quite aside from anything else, if it's deleted it will just be re-added once WP:GEOBOT reaches Pakistan on its list. – iridescent 14:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I had no idea there was a bot creating articles like this anyway. If that's the case there is no point this AFD continuing arbitrarily. As well as with the consensus here it will probably be snowed anyway. I Withdraw this AFD. ~ Ameliorate U T C @ 21:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.