Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaitanya Maharaj Deglurkar
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 15:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Chaitanya Maharaj Deglurkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not enough secondary sources. Article reads like advertisement. TheMandarin (talk) 05:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
As he is a spiritual guru with mass appeal in rural areas of Indian state of Maharashtra, not many ENGLISH articles are available as sources. Many MARATHI(language spoken in Maharashtra) websites have number of articles & news items about him. User:Advaitchothave talk —Preceding undated comment added 12:45, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable sources. Please cite Marathi reliable if available. --Redtigerxyz Talk 16:57, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Subject has sufficient coverage on online Marathi newspaper editions. Loksatta, Sakal, Lokmat, Dainik Ekmat, Marathwada Neta, Tarun Bharat. These examples are all non-trivial mentions of his. There are many trivial mentions also where he has been present in some kinda ceremonies, etc. I am sure many offline sources of other brands of newspapers or same brands but other editions are also available. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 09:54, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I went through the links. Still does not satisfy WP:GNG: "Significant coverage". IMO, all are trivial mentions. He is an author of spirituality/devotional articles of most, but no article goes in details about life or work. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- He giving spiritual lectures at some occasions at some places and various newspapers writing on what he said there is not trivial. There might be small booklets or even books on his life and work offline. That probability is not zero. ||Dharmadhyaksha|| {T/C} 03:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I went through the links. Still does not satisfy WP:GNG: "Significant coverage". IMO, all are trivial mentions. He is an author of spirituality/devotional articles of most, but no article goes in details about life or work. --Redtigerxyz Talk 18:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 16:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails notability. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:59, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 18:41, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - fails WP:NOTE and is most probably self-published. Wikidas© 13:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.