Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chai Khang Chao (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdraw‎ per recommendation of participants that the outcome of the first AfD should be upheld and further move-warring without improvement treated as a behavioral issue. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chai Khang Chao

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Immediately moved back to mainspace without improvement following a Draftify result at AfD. See prior AfD for arguments regarding notability. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Thailand. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:21, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:22, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify until episodes are released and then notability can be reassessed, particularly as there will likely be more sources available at that time. Redtree21 (talk) 02:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This should just have been re-draftified per the AfD result, with an explanation and ~~WP:trout~~ stern reprimand to วรุฒ หิ่มสาใจ. If anything, this is a behavioural issue on part of the user, not an AfD one. Rosguill, I would withdraw this nomination and move the page back to draft. I've already given วรุฒ หิ่มสาใจ a warning, in English and Thai, as they do appear to be unwilling to communicate in English. --Paul_012 (talk) 08:51, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I strongly support Paul 012's suggestion. WP:DRAFTOBJECT does not imv apply in the present case and rather: "Authors should try to understand and respond to the reason for moving to draft status, and then use the AfC submission process to have the page moved back to mainspace." (unless either the article is vastly improved or something has changed in the real world that makes the status of the subject considerably different (just like in a similar situation treated in this essay) (but the series has not been broadcast yet, as far as I know)). -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 15:49, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.