Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Redman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. If anyone wants this restored to work on in the future please let me know. Michig (talk) 14:59, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Redman[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable rugby player who hasn't played at first grade level. J Mo 101 (talk) 12:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've been getting rid of these kind of articles when the players have left their respective NRL clubs, this one certainly doesn't fit the notability criteria, I've just held off on this one so far because he's still with a club so could potentially become notable within the new season. So it's up to you if you want to remove it now or wait it out until he either debuts or leaves the club. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article can always be restored if and when he debuts. J Mo 101 (talk) 22:35, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Clear delete: or alternatively could be moved to someone's user space if they want to take it on. Mattlore (talk) 20:08, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Draft space, still technically on contract so he might get a game yet if the Knights have a huge injury crisis, although it's not looking good. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 07:48, 21 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]

I'll say delete - can easily be remade again if he plays. Josh the newcastle fan (talk) 07:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.