Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chad Horstman

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Yandy.com. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chad Horstman[edit]

Chad Horstman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

n independent notability -- covered adequately in the article on his company. DGG ( talk ) 09:58, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:01, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • merge either way. Staszek Lem (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or Merge. Not significant. scope_creepTalk 07:33, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or merge - not independently notable to the company, article has many PROMO issues. 1292simon (talk) 09:34, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: merge/delete are two very different outcomes, so it's odd to see them suggested as comparable alternatives.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:35, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge since there has been no suggestion to delete Yandy.com and this article contains some info about the company that is missing in that article, like the current owner (private equity firm SPK Capital and then ultimately Playboy Enterprises). MB 05:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.