Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ch-aviation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:37, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ch-aviation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No secondary sources (fails to meet WP:GNG) and little notability as a source LukeWWF (talk) 14:59, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:04, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Besides official website and a few other trivial pages that do not testify notability criteria, there is no sources that would ilustrate this company deserves an article. The references provided inside the article are also just a quick notices and add nothing substantial.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 17:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's not notable as a website or a news source. Looking up the website on Google, there is very little that is actually substantive about the website. The references barely mention the subjects of this article. Gorden 2211 (talk) 06:52, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not pass WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.