Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CertaPet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 18:24, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CertaPet

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources provide no in-depth, significant coverage of the subject and are not primarily about the subject.

[1] quotes a representative of the the company
[2] one mention of filling a form
[3] subject is used to provide a quote
[4] peripheral mention
[5] reporting is about emotional support animals, not the subject.

Mduvekot (talk) 17:33, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 10:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- promotional cruft on a nn company; fails WP:CORPDEPTH / WP:NCORP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:CORPDEPTH failure. The most reliable source cited in the article (The Economist) has nothing to do with the article subject at all, being used only to provide a quote from CertaPet.--SamHolt6 (talk) 01:41, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.