Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerkiew and kościół

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 06:14, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cerkiew and kościół[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First, Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. I found this article checking for redirects that should be pointing to Eastern Orthodox church architecture. There were most of this article's content should be merged, and most of the redirects, well, redirected. What little remains can be merged and redirected to church (building) as we don't seem to have Roman Catholic church architecture or Protestant church architecture yet. A German speaker should also stop by de wikipedia and AfD the German article there. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:49, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. —_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 17:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki to Wiktionary. Obviously, this entry better belongs there. Inter change able|talk to me 20:11, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. — Kpalion^(talk) 18:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. A discussion on Polish words that are not loan words doesn't belong on English WP. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 15:58, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.