Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceresana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ceresana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An article on a market research firm created by what appears to be a connected contributor and subsequently developed by IPs (without any WP:DISCLOSE). Regarding the text and references in the article (and in its de.wikipedia equivalent): production and issue of market reports is what a company of this type does, and gives rise to routine announcements which are considered as "trivial coverage" at WP:CORPDEPTH, as are notices of participation at trade fairs. Clearly this is a company going about its business, but my searches are not finding the in-depth WP:RS coverage specifically about the company which is required to demonstrate WP:CORP notability. AllyD (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 14:49, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No indications of notability, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:03, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.