Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ceres (organization)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (X! · talk) · @647 · 14:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ceres (organization) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unreferenced advert; no assertion of notability; could not be sourced Chzz ► 18:37, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." (WP:CORP) The article already cites articles from the Washington Post and the New York Times. It may not have inline citations, but AfD is not FAC. It's a bit hard to find more sources (given that Ceres can refer to a lot of things), but if you do a Google News search for Ceres and Mindy Lubber (the organization's leader), you get 459 results, nearly all relevant. If that's not significant coverage in reliable sources, I don't know what is. Cool3 (talk) 18:44, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 20:53, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. What do you mean, "could not be sourced"? As Cool3 points out, there are hundreds of news articles at least mentioning Ceres. "No assertion of notability"? Try reading Ceres (organization)#Key accomplishments. This nomination is completely flawed. Fences&Windows 21:50, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep. Page was just revised to include more links and impartiality.--Lets go duke (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2009 (UTC)lets go duke[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.