Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cerebral Slake

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:08, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Cerebral Slake[edit]

Cerebral Slake (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Filled up with forums, unreliable blogs, fansites as sources. No sign of independent coverage online. Reading the article doesn't highlight a significant career either. HandsomeBoy (talk) 19:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:55, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - He won some minor radio contests that are themselves non-notable and there is no evidence that any of his own songs were noticed by the public. The nominator is correct on how the article is dependent upon blogs and streaming sites that only prove the existence of him and his tracks, and no other sources can be found to show notability for either. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 22:03, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 10:19, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as non-notable. --Lockley (talk) 19:24, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I understand is a not more information but why deleted it? User:Lucifero4
  • Delete, I went through all the sources given, they are all trivial mentions and announcements, twitter, forum posts, blogs, the only one source with three paragraphs of text gets duplicated three times. Tried to search but nothing significant turned up. With the absence of multiple independent reliable sources that give in-depth coverage, it fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Hzh (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.