Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centurion Reactor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Centurion Reactor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be a WP:NEOLOGISM. Other sources apart from Greene do not use this term. Was prodded in 2009. Femke (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Femke (talk) 16:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The prod was contested without explanation by the article creator Srgreene (talk · contribs), a SPA who is likely Greene himself. However, the rationale was purely speculation about a possible copyright violation, which it most likely was not, so it was certainly correct to deprod. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 18:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - in addition to being WP:NEO, also appears to be WP:SYNTH. PianoDan (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I can't find any other sources on this, so it does seem to be Greene's (hopeful) neologism, but others don't seem to share that opinion that I can find. So also falls into theory/WP:OR. ---Avatar317 ^(talk) 05:01, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.