Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central line (London Underground)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was April Fools Day is over * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 16:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)‎[reply]

Central line (London Underground)

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Central line is the worst London Underground line. It is hot, cramped, and uncomfortable. On top of that, the motors keep failing on the 1992 stock, so it's also unreliable. The Elizabeth line adequately covers its destinations, except West Ruislip, where people can use Chiltern Railways. Both of these alternatives are far superior to the Central line.

Keep, because if there were no Central line, there would be no Gants Hill tube station, and nobody would want its amazing architecture to be no more. - delta (talk) 19:11, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.