Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Asian boar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Lourdes 16:11, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asian boar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unreferenced one-sentence article. I moved it to draftspace to be worked on, unfortunately it was just moved back to mainspace with no attempt to add references or establish notability in any way. No evidence of meeting WP:NOTABILITY. Boleyn (talk) 21:34, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's plenty of evidence including Current views on taxonomy and zoogeography of the genus Sus; Pigs and Humans: 10,000 Years of Interaction and the Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. Please see WP:BEFORE. Andrew D. (talk) 22:01, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Do we now apply notability guidelines more widely? I would think that any widely distributed species would deserve an article, and a subspecies would deserve either an article or a redirect. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 22:03, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:16, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep See comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corsico-Sardinian wild pig. Minimum done. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:54, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't have to meet WP:NOTABILITY. It simply has to meet WP:SPECIESOUTCOMES. Is this a valid zoological name or not. The nomination statement fails to address this one key point. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.