Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Asia Health Review (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Scientizzle 17:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Central Asia Health Review[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article about an on-line magazine was recreated immediately after a previous AfD, as noted on the article talk page. The website is now defunct and its domain is for sale. The article contains no indication that it was ever notable. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: It is still non-notable and doesn't even exist anymore. Joe Chill (talk) 12:29, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Ningauble (talk) 15:40, 27 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability for this short-lived journal. --MelanieN (talk) 14:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.