Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centifugually formed film growth

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Epitaxy#Liquid-phase. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:05, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Centifugually formed film growth[edit]

Centifugually formed film growth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability or even existence. Unsourced since its creation almost 12 years ago, and I couldn't find any reliable sources (or even any non-WP mirrors) that discuss this subject. Everymorning (talk) 18:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge new content to Epitaxy#Liquid-phase, or keep. A simple WP:BEFORE style search, along with correction of the misspelled title, allowed me to expand the article with 4 books, 1 conference proceedings, and 1 news article as references. The use of centrifuges in liquid-phase expitaxy seems well-established, but there isn't a great deal in the literature because of all the trade secrecy surrounding semiconductor processing. Right now it is a well-reference short stub. The LPE topic may be marginally notable. I would be fine with a keep outcome, but the material is probably better merged into Epitaxy#Liquid-phase to place it in better context. As a side note, I can hardly believe that we don't have a standalone article on LPE. --Mark viking (talk) 20:47, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I searched for "Centrifugally formed film growth" on Google but came up with nothing. What title did you search for to find all these sources? Everymorning (talk) 20:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    • From reading the article, I started with 'centrifugal solar cell' and learned a little. Then I refined it to 'centrifugal thin film growth', which returned some book refs and I learned some more. Then finally, I tried 'centrifugal LPE' as the most notable application of centrifuges in film growth. There is also centrifugal CVD for thin films (like diamond) but that didn't seem as notable. OK, maybe not such a simple search :-) --Mark viking (talk) 21:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J947( c ) (m) 19:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.