Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Experiments in Art, Information, and Technology
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge and redirect to California Institute of the Arts. WaltonOne 18:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Center for Experiments in Art, Information, and Technology[edit]
- Center for Experiments in Art, Information, and Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Tagged as questionable notability for 11 months without any substantial improvement. All references found in a reasonable search were about individuals at the institution, not the institution itself. Pastordavid (talk) 20:21, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I found some information on this in a Google search here however when I went here I couldn't open the page (maybe its just me). Dustitalk to me 20:32, 10 April 2008 (UTC)changing !vote to merge see below [reply]- Comment. Yeah, that is a link to the homepage. You've got no argument from me that it exists (which is what that website proves), just that it's notable. Pastordavid (talk) 20:49, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: So the fact that there are 321 hits on Google doesn't assert Verifiability? WP:V says "If no reliable, third-party (in relation to the subject) sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it." Dustitalk to me 20:59, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that there are 321 ghits does not show that any of them provide substantial information from a Reliable source about it. I couldnt find one in the first 60 or so. DGG (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not exactly sure about this one, I mean, I feel the article should stay because it's obviously there as you can see in the google search. Keep the article and let me work on it and try to bring it up to par. Dustitalk to me 12:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The fact that there are 321 ghits does not show that any of them provide substantial information from a Reliable source about it. I couldnt find one in the first 60 or so. DGG (talk) 04:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Seems to be part of Cal Arts music program and not notable on its own, except by association with Subotnick, etc. Recent edits haven't added anything to notability or style. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 16:22, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to CalArts. No significant coverage found, and it doesn't help that their website appears to be dead. Jfire (talk) 03:56, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into the article for CalArts. It wouldfit nicely there as one of their programs. DGG (talk) 04:36, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge or redirect After several days of looking, I was unable to find much more information of this particular article. Numerous hits on CalArts, which seems to be affiliated with CEAIT. I stronly suggest that, since CEAIT does exist and is affiliated with CalArts, you merge or redirect to CalArts. Dustitalk to me 15:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I don't see much to keep this link blue. --Stormbay (talk) 17:23, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.