Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Adventure Time in Australia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ·Add§hore· ^{Talk To Me!} 01:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Censorship of Adventure Time in Australia[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unsourced original research article on a non-notable subject. TheLongTone (talk) 10:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. Coverage of the subject is limited to blogs and forums. Any information with references can go in the main article on the show. --Colapeninsula (talk) 11:02, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As with this others, poorly-written original research. Tarc (talk) 14:15, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable. —Ed!^(talk) 15:35, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree with TheLongTone (talk · contribs). JJ98 (Talk) 18:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. JJ98 (Talk) 20:48, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. JJ98 (Talk) 20:50, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete suggest merging this with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Regular Show in Canada. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are afds mergable? there are three or four other similarly lame articles by the same editor up for deletion apart from the one above.TheLongTone (talk) 22:04, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not often done, but these are so similar and so awful that I doubt anyone would mind. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 22:08, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like needless effort really, all the discussions are going the same way:Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in Asia Pacific,(new & PRODed),Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in the United States,Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in Australia,Censorship of Regular Show in Latin America,Censorship of Regular Show in the United Kingdom,Censorship of Regular Show in Australia...apologies if I've duplicated or omitted, its a long and sorry tale.TheLongTone (talk) 22:27, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If the content is notable and sourced, it should go in the Adventure Time article itself. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:03, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Again, OR and incorrectly argued article as edits are for local concerns or timing and self-made by the local channel, not censorship by authorities. Nate • (chatter) 23:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per WP:SNOW. Same rationale as this similar article Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in the United States and these deleted ones Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Regular Show in Canada. Unsourced OR fancruft written by the same author. Funny ^Pika 21:01, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.