Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cenex (disambiguation)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non admin) since there are now two blue links, a few of the arguments are invalid. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 11:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cenex (disambiguation)[edit]

This has been converted into a disambig page, but the only other reference is to a company that doesn't seem notable. Therefore, I'm suggesting the deletion of this disambig page. Ta bu shi da yu 08:26, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator (CSD?). /Blaxthos 11:02, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: This is already up for discussion at Wikipedia:Requested moves. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 18:08, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Disambiguation pages are useful, and it could be expanded. David Q. Johnson 11:36, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This is true, but not the way that this has been done. My suggestion to both David Q. and Bondegezou is to create an article about the UK Centre for Excellence, then create a disambig. Any other way is really adding an article by stealth. - Ta bu shi da yu 02:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The Cenex that is the UK Centre for Excellence is not just any old company, but a UK government supported public-private initiative of what appears to me reasonable notability. Ergo, it could well have an article and this disambiguation page will be of value. Bondegezou 15:53, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, feel free to create the article :-) Ta bu shi da yu 02:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
P.S. just so everyone is aware, that Cenex website is positively evil. It obviously hasn't been debugged, as my script debugger keeps popping up asking me whether to break into the script. However, because it's in a loop, I had to kill Internet Explorer. You'd think that they'd be more careful... - Ta bu shi da yu 02:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete makes sense as there is not only one link. --Gavin Collins 07:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. As requested, I have now created an article on the UK Centre of Excellence. Bondegezou 09:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are now two blue linked articles on the page Mbisanz 06:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless there are other items that may refer or be referred to as Cenex. In cases with only two items to distinguish, each should have a reference to the other. "This article refers to the brand of petrol. For the Research initiative, see Centre of Excellence." or whatever. That way, each links to the other. Cenex itself would direct to the centre, with the disamb link going to the other item. Best, ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 17:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strike that, reverse it - the existing Cenex would remain as-is. I thought it linked to the parent company's article. A redirect of UK Cenex might be in order, if such a reference makes sense and could reasonably be expected as a search term. ZZ ^Claims~ Evidence 17:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.