Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cemil Uylukçu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:43, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cemil Uylukçu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The sources used in the article is directly related with the subject person. The notibility is not clear. Non of the sources used in the document are reliable sources. Manco Capac (talk) 12:00, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:50, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This article meets the notability criteria in my opinion because EBMAS is a huge organization located more than 43 countries having more than 15.000 students worldwide. Cemil Uylukçu is the chief instructor of Turkey and Bulgaria of this organization. He has a notable sports background. He is one of the most recognized in Wing Tsun and Escrima in Turkey.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Alemomer (talk • contribs) [1]

Delete BLP lacking reliable sources; would require a hell of a rewrite and sourcing to make it an acceptable article. I suggest deletion, because I don't see a way of fixing these problems. If anyone is able to produce sources to demonstrate notability (see also WP:BIO), then please let me know and I shall reconsider. Chzz ► 06:51, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find any reliable-source coverage of him at all, just self-promotion. I agree that the article itself is grotesquely metastasized and would require a fundamental rewrite if kept, but I don't think this guy passes WP:BIO to begin with. Glenfarclas (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- notability not demonstrated in a reliable secondary source -- this could be partly because so much of the article appears to be sourced from blogs, primary sources related to the subject, and so on. If someone who cares about the article were to delete all the many article claims that come from the unsuitable sources, it would be easier to detect if anything is left that, just might be, reliably sourced. N2e (talk) 03:15, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No independent sources. Non-notable martial artist (see WP:MANOTE and WP:ATHLETE). 72.20.219.166 (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject fails WP:ATH and WP:RS. Papaursa (talk) 04:09, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.