Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celina Tent Inc.
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 05:17, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Celina Tent Inc. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Several linked sources, but no SIGCOV to meet WP:CORP. Created as a conflict of interest by someone in the family that owns the firm. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 04:37, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 04:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete per WP:SERIESA. This is very clearly an attempt to promote the company, and could probably have been speedied due to its making no claim at all to notability. FalconK (talk) 10:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete trivial coverage. No justification for an article. It sahould perhaps have been a G11. DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.