Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celestial Heavens
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 20:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Celestial Heavens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable fansite per WP:WEB. Though it is somewhat well-known within a particular game community, I don't believe that this makes the site notable, any more so than any other site on the same topic. No secondary sources address the website as a subject. Ham Pastrami (talk) 00:51, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no importance or notability is asserted. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 03:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 01:08, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, notability not asserted, no WP:RS. --Kinu t/c 04:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. While I agree that notability is not well-established within this article, it is heavily linked-to from within WP. Would that tend to speak for its notability? --AnnaFrance (talk) 20:06, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not particularly; it could speak equally well for WP:LINKSPAM. Ham Pastrami (talk) 00:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, yes, I see. Thanks. Since that can't be considered reliable evidence of notability, I'd have to recommend delete also. --AnnaFrance (talk) 14:28, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - lack of notability. Randomran (talk) 05:45, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.