Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Wish List

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 01:57, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Wish List[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG Fiddle Faddle 23:52, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The only coverage seems to be IMDB and the broadcaster's own webpage; everything else seems to be for the common noun phrase "celebrity wish list," rather than this show.-Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:46, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After looking at what NinjaRobotPirate found, I guess I'm on the fence. I'm not familiar with any of these British sources and I don't feel like I can assess their reliability. -Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 17:22, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Well, I was going to vote to delete, but then I found some coverage: [1] from the Daily Record, [2] from Birmingham Mail, [3] from Worcester News, [4] from Daily Express, [5] from South Wales Argus. Also, it seems to have gotten nominated for some reality TV award: [6]. Most of the sources I found are either tabloids or regional newspapers that took up the story about a local charity that got highlighted. So, I'd like to hear what other people think about these sources. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:06, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, clpo13_(talk) 18:23, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It was canned after 8 episodes. I can't say I recall watching it but it was canned quickly for a reason - the channel decided it was non notable! Szzuk (talk) 09:48, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: This discussion was "relisted" twice within a few minutes on 20 December. The second relist by @UY Scuti: invoked a Twinkle bug whereby the entry was commented out of the 20 December log but no new listing was created, and therefore this page hasn't appeared on a log page since. Fixed now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --Finngall ^talk 21:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Zero-interest show that came and went quickly, but it aired on a national network; sometimes that's all that counts. Nate • (chatter) 07:51, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.