Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Celebrity Cookbook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Prince's Trust. Ged UK 13:11, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Cookbook[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK. A quick Google News search returns only one hit regarding this particular subject, from the Watford Observer. However, WP:NBOOK (and more generally, WP:GNG) requires coverage by multiple non-trivial sources. Furthermore, Notability isn't inherited – just because notable people contributed recipes does not make this book notable. Delete. Strange Passerby (talk • contribs) 12:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:46, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to The Prince's Trust. This is a "one fact/one sentence" article. I don't think in depth coverage will be forthcoming since no one would dare criticize any of the recipes, considering that the future king is behind the project. Kitfoxxe (talk) 17:30, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the current content per Kitfoxxe. The concept of a celebrity cookbook generally just might support a standalone article; but this is all about a particular celebrity cookbook raising funds for that charity. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:22, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.