Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cecilia Gaudette
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. StarM 03:16, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Cecilia Gaudette (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A case of WP:ONEEVENT, the articles statement of "most known for" is truly "only known for". It's simply not notable enough to require a seperate biography. –– Lid(Talk) 09:21, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Not really notable at all. Not only is she only known for one event, her part in that event - voting - is not particularly distinctive. AlexTiefling (talk) 11:39, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – First off, I referenced the piece. However, I agree with the nominator, in that the individual is just not notable on several levels. First, she is not the oldest voter in an America election. I believe that now belongs to a 110 year old young lady in North Carolina. Second, as the nominator pointed out, One Event, in that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. Maybe next election Sister Gaudette will make the cut. ShoesssS Talk 12:27, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.