Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cause + Affect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cause + Affect

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete - Cause + Affect website say they are closing down, so it is only a 3 year company anyway. Rwendland (talk) 12:45, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's not a concern here; the concern is notability (or lack thereof). In order to be deemed non-notable, Cause + Affect must lack "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (WP:GNG). Chris the Paleontologist (talk • contribs) 23:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, you're right to point that out. I was being careless in what I wrote - I'd also done a search for notable comment about them and could also not find anything; I should have mentioned that but forgot. Rwendland (talk) 09:14, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 01:55, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 05:05, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as spam and failure of WP:WEB. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 05:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- seems a simple case of advertising by an SPA. I keep wanting to correct the company's name, too. Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: googling finds no sources suggesting notability, and as it is closing down after a 3 year life, future notability unlikely. Rwendland (talk) 10:41, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.