Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Psychedelic Synth Folk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 19:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Psychedelic Synth Folk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not mentioned in any reliable sources, only on websites like spotify and last-fm, and fora, to describe one or two albums. Seems to have been coined for some 2016 youtube video? Not a genre that has received attention as required by our notability guidelines. Fram (talk) 14:53, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wanted to find out about this genre, but couldn't find anything. With the parts of information I found on the web, I made this page. This page could help others who want to read about the genre. --Mozart834428196 (talk) 14:56, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Looking around for more information on this, I mostly found the music of one Sister Irene O'Connor-- for the most part, it's people posting her works to Reddit [1] and captioning the genre as "Catholic psychedelic synth folk". I would propose just making this into an article on Irene O'Connor, but I don't think that she meets notability standards either (despite one article [2] in the Irish Times). Gilded Snail (talk) 14:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or Redirect. I note that the page author is here. I had a look for sources, and couldn't find any. I would recommend merging this article (only a single sentence at the moment) with one of more of the articles on Psychedelic folk or Christian music. Please ping me if significant sources come to light. I note that the former of those two articles includes a well-referenced section on 'Freak folk', and that's possibly a good model for the topic under discussion here. Ross-c (talk) 15:03, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think we should just search for many sources and try and make an article out of this. Otherwise lets just link it in with another article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mozart834428196 (talk • contribs) 15:04, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:GNG. If you want to "try and make an article out of this" it should be done in draftspace. Jmertel23 (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:59, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or Redirect: I wish to redirect the page to psychedelic folk. Is that alright with everybody? --Mozart834428196 (talk) 20:26, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. There are no reliable sources discussing this term, so it has no place anywhere on Wikipedia, not separately, but also not as a part of a larger article. Fram (talk) 10:01, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Complete blank on sources. Sounds like something that was made up one day. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:10, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.