Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Heald (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Was also eligible for G5 speedy deletion, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Excel23. MER-C 17:13, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Catherine Heald

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has serious BLP problems. Though there are lots of references, many of them such as this don't actually mention the subject, or don't have enough information in them to easily identify and back up the claims cited. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 08:47, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as per nom. MrsSnoozyTurtle 11:22, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I feel it needs to be rewritten somewhat to be less promotional, but the subject seems to have impact on her industry, peeer reviews, and more that a few citations.174.48.198.196 (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, and I tried rewriting the article, and searched for additional sources, but no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. Beccaynr (talk) 19:30, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for trying. I had a look for sources, but I think this is unsalvageable, hence starting the AfD. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. -Kj cheetham (talk) 09:43, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.